The Necessity of Communication and Collaboration between Agencies in the Criminal Justice

the Criminal Justice

Scenarios where Interagency Communication and Collaboration is Important

  1. Conducting a Legal Research among Police officer, Probation Officer, and Prison Guard

Collaboration by the individuals from various agencies represented by a police officer, probation officer, and prison guard enables them to share information, exchange ideas, and work together for a common goal in the criminal justice system. The Fourth Amendment indicates that a police officer requires a judicial warrant before engaging in personal property search (Renan, 2016). Therefore, a probation officer works in collaboration with a police officer in acquiring the search warrant from the judge for use by the police officer in operation. While the inmate is on probation, the prison guard engages in their protection and also in the search operation by searching the prison grounds and cells and even frisking the inmate (Renan, 2016). Thus, in any legal search, police officers, probation officers, and prison guards must collaborate and communicate to ensure a successful process.

  • An investigation involving an incarcerated prisoner by a police officer. The police officer would like to know who the prisoner spoke to on the phone and who visited him. Describe who the police officer would need to collaborate with to obtain that information.

In every prison, there is a prison administration with a communication department. This department deals with communication which involves communication over devices such as telephone and also visits such as by the family and friends (Rajaee et al., 2016). Therefore, a police officer should collaborate with the communication department under the prison administration to know all about the inmate’s latest communication. The International Association of Police Chiefs instructs that the information concerning an inmate’s communications, progress, or other purposes can be accessed over the internet the (Rajaee et al., 2016). However, approval by the prison administration is crucial.

  • Lou, a suspect the officer was investigating a burglary case, was just convicted of that crime. Before his sentence, the court needs to receive a pre-sentence report must. Who is most likely to lead the investigation: the police officer, probation officer, or the prison guard? Who will he or she collaborate with to complete the report? How the process impacts interagency collaboration.

A probation officer usually is in charge of preparing the presentence report. This officer is responsible providing the investigation results to the court during the defendant’s conviction proceedings. Before the defendant’s appearance in court, he/she must pass through arrest by the police officer. Therefore, a probation officer should collaborate with the law enforcement agency to acquire details on the criminal history of the defendant. This procedure appears in Rule 32 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure of 2015 (Neubauer & Fradella, 2015). In this light, the officer should focus on the financial, psychological, and medical impacts caused by the defendant (Neubauer & Fradella, 2015). Thus, he/she should collaborate with other agencies including credit agencies and the crime victim. However, this should be done in light of the attorney to avoid linking the defendant with unreasonable offenses.

  • Select one court case where communication and collaboration were driving factors, and discuss the impact of that case in reshaping the role of the corrections practitioner.

Case: Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 (1976)

The case emerged after an inmate, Gamble, sued the prison facility, warden, and Texas Department of Corrections for inadequate medical treatment, denial of a work excuse, and punishment to work while unfit (Conway, 2016). The case later appeared in the US Supreme Court where three rights including (a) the right to access healthcare, (b) the right to care that is ordered, and (c) the right to a professional medical judgment were implemented (Conway, 2016). In this case, poor communication and collaboration between agencies led to the failure to manage and handle inmates as required. Although Gamble informed the prison guard on his condition, he later appeared to the disciplinary committee accused of the inability to work. Gamble’s delayed treatment condition took place as a result of the failure of the Texas Department of Corrections to work efficiently in collaboration with the prison department in the provision of medical services for the inmates.

  • Based on your findings regarding the differences in how each branch communicates with each other, which career path is most in line with your communication and collaboration practices and why?

My communication and collaboration practices are in line with the administration and organizational management. This department deals with various communication and collaboration purposes within an organization through creating the partnerships with other agencies and also through delegating duties to the staff members in a unit.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *